Structural Functionalist Theory of Stratification (Talcott Parsons)
( UPSC Optionals)
Structural Functionalist Theory of Stratification (Talcott Parsons)
( UPSC Optionals)
Introduction
- Developed by Talcott Parsons and influenced by Émile Durkheim.
- Views society as a complex system where every part contributes to stability and functioning.
- Stratification is considered inevitable and necessary for societal equilibrium.
PYQs: Structural Functionalist Theory
- Write short note: Functional theory of stratification. (88/20)
- संक्षिप्त टिप्पणी लिखें: स्तरीकरण का कार्यात्मक सिद्धांत। (88/20)
- Analyze critically the functional theory of social stratification. (98/60)
- सामाजिक स्तरीकरण के कार्यात्मक सिद्धांत का समालोचनात्मक विश्लेषण करें। (98/60)
- What are the reasons for calling Kingsley Davis and Wilbert Moore's theory of social stratification a functional theory? (09/30)
- किंग्सले डेविस और विल्बर्ट मूर के सामाजिक स्तरीकरण के सिद्धांत को एक कार्यात्मक सिद्धांत कहने के क्या कारण हैं? (09/30)
- Explain Melvin Tumin's critique related to the theory of social stratification. (02/60)
- सामाजिक स्तरीकरण के सिद्धांत से संबंधित मेल्विन टूमिन की आलोचना की व्याख्या करें। (02/60)
- Elucidate the basic premises of Davis' structural-functional theory of social stratification. How far is it relevant in understanding contemporary Indian society? (16/20)
- डेविस के सामाजिक स्तरीकरण के संरचनात्मक-कार्यात्मक सिद्धांत के मूल परिसर को स्पष्ट करें। समकालीन भारतीय समाज को समझने में यह कितना प्रासंगिक है? (16/20)
- Evaluate if social stratification is functional for society. (18/10)
- मूल्यांकन करें कि क्या सामाजिक स्तरीकरण समाज के लिए कार्यात्मक है। (18/10)
- Davis and Moore made it clear that social stratification is a functional necessity and also an unconscious device. Discuss. (19/10)
- डेविस और मूरे ने स्पष्ट किया कि सामाजिक स्तरीकरण एक कार्यात्मक आवश्यकता है और एक अचेतन उपकरण भी है। चर्चा कीजिए । (19/10)
Key Aspects
1. Basis of Stratification
- Conformity to Consensus
- Stratification is based on conformity to societal norms.
- Every society has consensus on norms and values (value consensus).
- Conformity to norms is considered desirable.
- Individuals who conform are rewarded.
2. Structure of Stratification
- Inequality Based on Rewards
- Rewards are distributed based on the level of conformity.
- Higher conformity leads to higher positions in society.
- Capability and Self-Evaluation
- People differ in their capabilities to conformity to norms.
- People evaluate themselves in terms of their ability to conform to the norms.
- Hence, they assure themselves that they are given position as per their ability.
3. Consequences of Stratification
- Inevitable: Stratification is natural due to the need for diverse abilities to fulfill societal tasks.
- Functional: It integrates individuals into society by aligning them with societal norms and values.
4. Universality
- Universality
- Stratification is inevitable and universal in all societies.
- It persists regardless of societal changes.
- Desirability
- Stratification is desirable.
Criticisms
1. Melvin Tumin
- Argues stratification creates barriers to opportunities rather than promoting meritocracy.
- Questions whether rewards genuinely reflect role importance.
- It perpetuates privilege and limits social mobility.
- E.g. Limited Applicability: The theory assumes equal opportunities and an open (achievement-based) system, which doesn’t apply to caste-based societies like India.
2. C. Wright Mills
- Critiques the theory for overlooking the role of power and domination in stratification.
- Points out that elites often maintain their position through coercion rather than cultural consensus.
- E.g. Stratification can be divisive and create conflict rather than being functional.
- E.g. Neglecting Change and Resistance
- Fails to address what happens when societal values are challenged (e.g., Naxalite movements).
- Ignores the impact of societal transformations, like the modernization of traditions.
3. Pierre Bourdieu
- Challenges Parsons by focusing on cultural and social capital.
- Emphasizes how these non-material forms of capital reinforce inequality.
4. Ralf Dahrendorf
- Criticizes the neglect of power and conflict in Parsons’ theory.
- Highlights how elites may manipulate stratification to maintain their dominance.
Applicability
- Open Societies vs. Rigid Societies
- Works well in societies with equal opportunities and open systems where achievement determines status.
- Limited Use in Rigid Societies: Fails in systems with rigid hierarchies like caste-based or feudal societies.
- Caste System
- The caste system reflects stratification based on cultural values and hierarchical roles.
- Functionalist theory explains its role in maintaining traditional social order.
- Corporate Hierarchies (USA)
- Functionalist theory applies to corporate structures, where roles are stratified based on skill and reward.
- Ensures efficient allocation of resources and responsibilities.